/s4s/ - anime pillow fight

>>31335
what did he say

>>31337
The word of our lord and saviour Jesus Christ

>>31334
ohhh yeah, chrome for android added this weird image picker thing a few versions ago and it loads much faster than the one I was using, this new one changes filenames and does something with the images, maybe it's re-encoding them, do they look worse than before?

Untitled.png
[Hide] (1MB, 850x1171)

>>31354
Looks exactly the same to my untrained eye. But >>30356 (OP)  is a smaller filesize than >>31322
Taking the difference of them in GIMP they're the exact same image to the pixel so I guess it's just a worse(?) encoding of the same data
>it loads much faster than the one I was using
Lossy image encodings (unlike lossless lole) have improved a lot in the past decade, with google in particular giving zero fucks about compression and trying to wring out as much speed as they can in lossy compression (I'm sure that's good for their AI metadata too lolemao) so it's probably google thumbnailing them in some proprietary format that they can convert to/from and they've decided to use bigger jpgs to store things as cos they're faster to open or something.
This has led to a journey into getting a new pet peeve in a 'feature' (being black point compensation) that you would never want that's on everywhere all the time that midwits will literally barge into threads about people asking for help with an issue caused specifically by it saying that you must never ever turn it off and it should be on all the time when it's literally causing the issue and the actual solution that the user did in some cases get help in finding was to turn it off.
Als

>>31356
someone should read this

>>31365 (OP) 
>5
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PcfwM4RH3rc

__original_drawn_by_avogado6__sample-b4fa5e738fa5cfba84cec02bd26b713e.jpg
[Hide] (48.1KB, 850x850)

>>31367
WAIT I MEANT THIS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ER9KYLtnrI4
V

yea

All the badges and stickers I've gotten from merchants are for albums or sex toys lol
I can imagine this sort of thing is a lot easier if you're collecting idol goods or buy anime rather than manga.

>>31352
you can put plushes and acrylic keychains in them too, it's easier if your favorite character gets lots of merch but that doesn't stop ppl from getting dozens of the same can badge.

I think it's a bad look though, the usual way you get that many of the same badge in japan is if you spend hundreds rerolling on gachapon machines.

>>31353
Oh I see it now it has a clear plastic sleeve over the front. That's kinda cringe.
Just get a bag where the outer surface isn't integral to it's e.g. watertightness and pin things to it with normal pins. Our gyaru/lolita ancestors had this shit figured out last century.

>>31315
stop doing that!!

>>31316
did you read it?

>>31317
uhhhh yes??

I'm >>31246

>>31315
How are you so mindbroken by the concept of posts longer than two sentences?

>>31342
did you read this?

ojou.jpg
[Hide] (479.4KB, 1920x1080)

Can you still bring yourself to love me even though there's hardly a soft spot left on my body?

>>31324
This poster has a rough, calloused boyhole

>>31336
heh
Strictly speaking I don't know what the texture of my insides is like cos I've never felt it without both lubricant and mucosa, but as far as I can tell from how it feels with those present and comparing to e.g. a dried out part of the inside of your mouth my ass is pretty damn firm. I mean it's insistently flanked by muscle, which is the entire reason we have concepts like loosening your ass or only being able to get so much in in the first place.

Never had colby

118881ecd8cd4c1eff7c54a110fd136e547f60dfb1da2b2dbcdf8a7abbee028f.png
[Hide] (1.1MB, 900x1460)

>>31312
It'd be kinda cute if you (the character) thought every post you've replied to with
>did anyone read this?
was by the same person but you've played your hand too hard and made it clear that you're actually reading the threads lole
The uncomfortable middlegroundness makes it look like you're actually trying your hardest and it's just limited in scope because it's actually the best you can do. You should go back to being terse and earnest cos it kinda keeps the mystery that might actually bait someone into being invested.
Also it answered the question
>Are you replying to yourself?
Which kinda defeats the purpose of writing >>31309 in the first place. It's not much of a false flag if you go back and sign your name on it.

>>31320
uhhhh HHH 

what?
the "did anyone read this poster" is you and not me

>>31321
The "did anyone read this poster" is the author of less than half and probably none of the posts/threads you've posted it under.
What's up with your filenames?

>>31320
did anyone read this poster

suigintou.jpg
[Hide] (229.6KB, 600x750)

>>31325
Did anyone read this poster?

>>31170 (OP) 
wait who's doing the inviting and who got invited