>>67346
>Rightists actively wish harm upon individual beings just because they have a trait assigned in the prenatal phase that they can not possibly control and have no proof of any wrongdoing whatsoever, it is not even remotely comparable to putting one to death because he thinks of humans that way.
You didn't even define rightists so I barely know what you're talking about lole. Do lolberts count in whatever you mean by "rightists". Whatever. And who says those so called rightists actively wish harm upon individual beings? Most racists I know are just isolationist TBH so I don't know where you got that idea from. So what you are trying to say is "Since rightists discriminate based on immutable characteristics (which I think is bad) I think they should be stripped of their human rights and get executed on the spot." Is this what you meant to say by " it is not even remotely comparable to putting one to death because he thinks of humans that way." because it wasn't that easy to understand.
>If you think my statement is that much of a paradox you're nothing but the rightist in the aforementioned statement.
damn sorry bro I thought you believed in human rights. My bad. I guess human rights for me but not for thee?
>On top of that, in a nation where my rule would exist nobody would be harmed as long as they don't express those beliefs
Not a very big fan of free speech I assume?
But we don't even have to get into hypotheticals where you would be supreme dictator to pass such laws, because they already exist in Europe.
>while in the rightist nation you'd get murdered and that's that.
I'll just take your word.
>It might not be the utopian option, but no defense is.
Stalin? Is this you?
>Rapists and murderers should also be stripped of their human rights FYI
Not very woke of you tbhon.