>>42892
>>42891
came back and you didn’t even try to answer my question. i’ll go through the list on my own.
>it's not your responsibility to make sure everyone feels loved
this is you saying that i made the post out of a sense of responsibility, to make everyone feel loved. i denied this by saying i chose to post it
>i'm just offering a different perspective
this is saying that you wanted to offer me the perspective that it isn’t my responsibility to make people feel loved. since i had already denied this, i am saying that your perspective was already known to me at the time. this means your perspective is not opposed to mine
>i understand the intent
headache begins here. i can assume this extends from the previous thought of me making this post as part of my responsibility to make everyone feel loved. you could also be saying that the intent was to be opposed to wish, because of something confounding you wrote later
>but you also can't take that other poster's blatant negativity at face value
this statement continues from the previous thought, where you say that you understand my intent for making the post. the word “but” means you disagree with me or that i’m wrong. all together, you seem to be saying that the intent of making this post comes from a perspective of taking wish’s negativity at face value, causing me to feel responsible for making everyone feel loved. you are offering me the perspective that i’m not responsible. since i had already denied this by saying i chose to post it and didn’t feel responsible, you might instead be saying that my post was retaliation/punishment against wish for being negative. i only say this because of the next part
>that specific post was posted by someone who also happens to likely be going through withdrawals. it's like taking a pacifier out of a babies mouth, of course there is bound to be a tantrum.
this is you saying why the negativity of the other post shouldn’t be taken at face value, because it’s the equivalent of a child throwing a tantrum.
my question is this: what does that have to do with my post? why should their reason for posting their negative post prevent me from posting my positive one, unless you’re saying my post is retaliatory.
finally:
>it's not important anyways
it’s not YOUR responsibility to decide what is or isn’t important for everyone else.
i love you.
Your Fortune: Expect Ill Tidings