>>30865
You're not beholden but it's off topic, and has no relation to the post you're replying to. The expectation is not to not post your inane bullshit but not to attempt to relate it to posts that could not have less to do with it.
You're also wrong on every point, of course.
>you're like those pseuds who claim you can't extrapolate conclusions from linked references that weren't explicitly spelled out for you.
Nice vocabulary retard. That's literally pseudointellectualism, you are so formulaic and uncreative in the desperate ad-hominims you turn to at even the suggestion that someone disagrees with the random and thoughtless comments that you've purposelessly shoved in the face of anyone who will give you the time of day that you've started to write out an antonymic redefinition of the only term you seem capable of using.
Shocking stuff, really.