Since you're the kind of retard that needs this spelt out, these are my opinions and not necessarily reflective of the views of other users. Particularly, you don't seem to grasp that this site specifically is an anonymous BBS rather than the more 2020s style of social media with identity verification like facebook or current era 4chan and that the kinds of people that use either and the kinds of content that people expect to see might be different.
>if my name was 'squishy' and I was some generic femboy #73267327
If squishy was trying to make some kind of forced speech about his personal identity as an indian faggot without any kind of story or purpose (as you are by identityfagging so) then yes, it'd be a totally garbage shit quality thread.
>if my name was 'squishy' and I was some generic femboy #73267327 you would be saying this thread is an epic masterpiece
Nobody would say that either way. The OP and first post are samey nothingness, which is fine. People don't go around saying that flagstones on the sidewalk are masterpieces, they just walk over them without noticing because they're the standard substrata and unremarkable. >>14335 and >>14342 are good posts that actually make a joke on the theme(s) established. The problem with the thread is that you whine and bitch about not getting the right attention; what makes the thread intensely shitty is especially >>15768 because it takes the thread from unremarkable and forgettable to whiny attentionwhore edrama garbage because you demand that people look at something not worth their time, so of course they'll react negatively to it.
>if my name was 'squishy' and I was some generic femboy #73267327 you would be saying this thread is an epic masterpiece
If you really believed that and you really wanted that you'd post as squishy but you want people to praise some relentlessly bitchy 3dpd fat loser who can't even post other people's entry level edits without feeling the need to relate them to his flabby face.
>but you rage just because I have the name field filled in
People say that your posts suck because your posts suck. They're harsher because your posts are connected to a galaxy of fucking garbage via the name field, and you don't seem to understand that the ambiguity of posting as squishy compared to namefagging with an established pattern of behavior would expand the reasonable range of how posts could be interpreted. Because people know that you aren't able to say or do anything interesting there's no doubt in their mind that when you make a garbage post with no point other than to whine about not getting enough affirmation (for publicizing the fact that you're a loser?) that that's all that's there. We don't even need to wonder if a third party is doing a bit under your name because of course, the thread's not interesting and this direction doesn't lead itself to any particular kind of joke, so there's no reason for an anon to go for that kind of setup.
Your thread is shit and you're a loser, but by relating the two you heighten each. If the commonality between shit threads nobody wants to read is your name, of course it will become hated.