281530.jpg
[Hide] (654.5KB, 1680x1230) >>9873
>They all act exactly like this
Well yeah, it's how literally everyone with any trace of culture acts. Death of the author is a trillion years old and antiidentityfaggotry has been mainstream since '06, you're just a subhuman nigger living shitting in your own hand and throwing it from a mud hut.
Just because you're a newage fucking faggot bitchass nigger normalfag (a tranny) as opposed to a more traditional one doesn't make you any less of a subhuman.
>>9890
>at the same time i get it
The later, sure (though cute is more just something to abstractly strive towards since it's a/the moral virtue), but you're wildly misunderstanding the deep utility of the internet and anonymous context if you think it's some bitchass contextual distancing from some group I have zero fucking awareness of. There is no reason to compromise at all in an anonymous argument. You may as well present your ideals as unvarnished and as strictly as possible; you're doing nobody a service with anything else. Why say that things that are bad, that you might let pass by weakness or laziness in another space, are anything but bad in a space like this where there's no consequence and no cost to doing so?
>>9877
Gender essentialism was incoherent nonsense peddled by morons and with no acceptance whatsoever by anyone with an level of relevance to high culture back in 300BC too, faggot. It even fell out of the fucking establishment intelligensia, the last holdout of buying into bizzaro internally contradictory thought experiments from hundreds of years past, in the 80s. It was dead in mainstream scifi before your grandparents were fucking born. Repeating the same moronic shit with no relevance to theory or practice doesn't make it somehow more relevant.